It's not often that the NLRB gets front page treatment in major newspapers, and I don't think it's ever been one of the "most viewed" stories on the online New York Times. Certainly it's never been featured on gossip site PerezHilton. But this week the Board has been in the news because it is going after an employer that fired an employee for her Facebook posts criticizing a supervisor. Perez Hilton, incidentally, thinks the employee should have been fired.
The employee in question was fired by American Medical Response after she posted comments critical of one of the company and one of her superivsors on her Facebook page. The NLRB issued a complaint charging the company with firing the worker for engaging in protected activity -- criticizing the boss -- and for maintain a rule prohibiting employees from talking about the company in any way on Facebook or other social media sites.
The NLRB is merely extending to Facebook posts a rule that already applies in the workplace: talking about working conditions with coworkers is protected under the NLRA; thus, it would be unlawful to fire an employee for complaining about a supervisor while standing at the water cooler. The only difference in this case is that the discussion took place on Facebook.
Perhaps this is a signal that the NLRB is coming into the 21st Century. One of the more infamous cases under the Bush Board was Register Guard. In that case, the NLRB held that employees had no right to use employer email systems for union activity, even though employees could use emails for all kinds of other activities. In a blistering dissent, Members Liebman and Walsh accused the majority of confirming the Board's reputation as the “Rip Van Winkle of administrative agencies.” Given the Board's analysis in Register Guard, it was hard to disagree with the characterization.
The decision to issue a complaint in the Facebook case pehaps shows a new willingness of the NLRB to tackle emerging workplace issues and bring the agency into this modern era of the internet, email, and social media. Given the recent election, the Board may only have two years to do that before a Republican president reshuffles the composition of the Board and starts a retreat from boldly enforcing employee rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment